“Scaffolding” has become one of those edu-speak terms that catch on and become part of our vocabulary, but what does it really mean? Is it like the scaffolding on a building when it’s being repaired or painted? To test your understanding of it, take this quiz:
The term “to scaffold” means:
The answer, as in many of these multiple choice questions, is of course “all of the above.”
Scaffolding can include general support, different support for different students–and, importantly, a support a teacher takes away once it’s no longer needed. A common way to explain scaffolding is to think of training wheels on a bicycle; once the rider knows how to balance and pedal (and brake!), the wheels are taken off. An example in the classroom would be a note-taking form students use when doing research; after they learn the skill, they may not need the form.
Let’s explore how scaffolding can be provided in PBL. (And as a former English teacher and language curmudgeon, I will try in this post to not use the verb form.)
Sometimes we hear people say that project-based learning is not appropriate for “some” students. They say PBL should be reserved for students who are more skilled, more fluent in English, reading at or above grade level, etc. But all students deserve the benefits PBL can bring, and can succeed with it, if given proper scaffolding.
It’s important not to “over-scaffold,” however, to promote student growth and independence. We should have high expectations for all students. As teacher educator and author of Culturally Responsive Teaching and the Brain Zaretta Hammond points out, “Instructional equity happens when the teacher is scaffolding learning to the point that the scaffold at some moments falls away… Unfortunately, what I often see are… permanent instructional crutches. Students remain dependent learners; they never internalize cognitive routines and procedures.”
One thing to keep in mind is that some scaffolding can be planned ahead of time because you can anticipate what your students will need in order to successfully complete the project. The need for other or additional scaffolds will become apparent during the project as a result of formative assessment, as you coach students and check their work-in-progress.
Another important point is that most teachers already have a toolbox full of scaffolding strategies; it’s just a matter of repurposing them for a PBL context. You might have to add a few new tools given the nature of PBL–tools for scaffolding inquiry, working in teams, making presentations, and so on.
Here are some typical scaffolding strategies you might already know–which can also be used in PBL to support students in accessing content and academic skills.
Below are some examples of new scaffolding strategies you might need to use in PBL:
Skill Needed for PBL |
Scaffolding Strategy |
How to work in teams |
Co-create a collaboration rubric; fishbowl modeling of skills; project management tools |
How to generate questions, think critically, or solve a problem |
Model thinking skills with think-alouds; post a list of problem-solving or decision-making steps on the classroom wall; use examples |
How to formatively assess a piece of work and give peer feedback |
Teach routines and protocols for critique & revision; provide sentence starters for “diplomatic” critique; practice with a sample |
How to begin an inquiry process |
Use thinking routines like “See, Think, Wonder” with a chart to record students’ observations, inferences, & questions |
How to interview an expert |
Provide a template for what to say, for students to fill in; run practice sessions with the teacher playing the role of expert |
How to make a presentation |
Co-create a presentation rubric; provide a presentation planning guide; record rehearsals on video for self-critique |
How to reflect on learning, process, & products |
Use reflection routines; provide prompts; ask students to share & discuss their reflections |
For more on scaffolding in PBL, see Project Based Teaching, by Suzie Boss with John Larmer (ASCD/BIE 2018).
About the Author:
John Larmer is a project-based learning expert. In his 20 years at the Buck Institute for Education/PBLWorks, he co-developed the model for Gold Standard PBL, authored several books and many blog posts, and contributed to curriculum and professional development. John is now the Senior PBL Advisor at Defined Learning.